Arimathea | Philosophy | Kalb on Subsidiarity | Permalink
Page views: 2692515
Total entries: 1461
Total comments: 225



Wednesday, April 2, A.D. 2014
Kalb on Subsidiarity

A few months ago, James Kalb published a short essay on The Catholic World Report about subsidiarity’s place in the modern world: “How Do We Advance Subsidiarity?” A selection:

. . . A basic problem is the difficulty of limiting the modern state and modern economic life. The state doesn’t want to be limited, because people who like to run things believe they know best. And technology has multiplied our ability to buy and sell whatever we need, and seems to hold out the prospect of absolute freedom through unlimited wealth.

For that reason money and the state pervade more and more aspects of social life today: fast food, day care, social welfare schemes, and electronic entertainment all substitute for family life, for example. The result is a political and social system based ever more totally on government bureaucracies and the market, with their relative power determined by relative institutional advantages and by shifting popular sentiment that both powers try to mold and manipulate with the aid of their allies and hangers-on.

The two working together are unlimited in their ambitions and demands, and they have no interest in subsidiarity. They believe they can do anything, and the growing exclusion of religious faith from public life means that the secular utilitarian ways of thinking that guide them function as a substitute religion. The result is that they feel called on to remake all human life in their own image, turning it into a system of maximum equal preference satisfaction consistent with the efficiency, coherence, and security of the social machine.

The only constituents ultimately taken seriously in that machine are the state and the individual. Church and family dissolve as independent institutions with their own principles of legitimacy. . . .

Such a system is at odds with subsidiarity, since the latter won’t exist unless non-state institutions have their own principles of legitimacy, and the system insists on extirpating such principles for the sake of its own coherence and dominance. . . .

Kalb has some thoughtful practical suggestions in the piece for those of us who find the contemporary situation repellant.

Posted by Joseph on Wednesday, April 2, Anno Domini 2014
Philosophy | AnthropologyPoliticsComments
Previous entry (all realms): Fool’s History
Next entry (all realms): Cool Kits

Previous entry (Philosophy): Praxis contra Ideology
Next entry (Philosophy): Abortion Celebration